Banner
Home → Compliance Update

Compliance Update
S. Florida's Highest Paying Jobs Print E-mail
Written by FHI's Week in Review   
Tuesday, 15 September 2015 14:28

Based on research done by the SFBJ, physicians occupy five out of the six highest paying jobs in South Florida. Shaun Bevan, in a 9.11.15 post, reports that Surgeons (1), Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2), Family and General Practitioner (4), Physicians and Surgeons, All Other (5) and Internists, General (6) are top earners in the region. Chief Executives are the only non-medical profession to crack the top six, coming in at number three.

Read more in the current issue of FHI's Week in Review - 9/14/15 http://conta.cc/1LtPfuz

Last Updated on Thursday, 01 October 2015 12:41
 
Avoiding Delays in License Renewals Print E-mail
Written by FL BOM via FL Healthcare Law Firm Blog   
Thursday, 10 September 2015 00:00

It’s almost renewal time once again for many health care practitioners. If this is your renewal cycle, please note the following information provided by the Florida Board of Medicine, which can help you avoid some of the most common delays encountered with license renewals. It is important to remember the upcoming renewal is the first to have mandatory continuing medical education reporting requirements. If you have not done so, please activate your account with CE Broker and ensure that all required CME you have completed for this renewal has been uploaded.

Most of the medical practitioners renewing will be required to submit the following...

Read More>>
 
A Lot Can Be Learned from Tuomey Court Print E-mail
Written by Jeff Cohen | Florida Healthcare Law Firm Blog   
Tuesday, 04 August 2015 00:00

The Tuomey decision, U.S. Court of Appeals case out of South Carolina, contains important lessons for physicians, especially as it relates to (1) compensation arrangements with hospitals, (2) proper compensation arising in connection with the provision of designated health services ("DHS"), and (3) the advice of counsel defense.
 
The concept of DHS arises largely in the context of the federal Stark Law, which in pertinent part (1) forbids physicians from owning and referring to providers of DHS (e.g. PT, rehab, diagnostic imaging, home health, DME, clinical laboratory, inpatient and outpatient hospital services), (2) describes how medical practices can provide DHS to their own patients, and (3) forbids even physicians within a practice from allocating DHS profits on the basis of who ordered or referred to them.

The Tuomey case involves a whistleblower action filed against a not for profit hospital system.

Read More>>
 
Possible delay of MU Stage 3? Print E-mail
Written by FHI's Week in Review   
Monday, 27 July 2015 00:00

WH 
Virgil Dickson, in a 7.23.15 Modern Healthcare post, reports:

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee is asking to delay Stage 3 Meaningful-Use Rules, its chairman, Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), said during a news conference Thursday.

WIM
This will be one of several recommendations his committee will make to the Obama administration in a push to expand the use of electronic health records, which some providers say are costly and time-consuming. Sen. Alexander expressed hope that healthcare would not "go backwards on EHRs," but discussed the possibility of delaying MU3 to ensure the process goes smoothly.

Read more in the current issue of Week in Review>>

Last Updated on Tuesday, 28 July 2015 13:03
 
Federal prosecutors increasingly target individual healthcare execs in anti-fraud efforts Print E-mail
Written by Health Law Offices of Anthony Vitale   
Thursday, 16 July 2015 11:07

Last month's sentencing of the former president and CEO of OtisMed Corporation to two years in prison should serve as yet another example that federal prosecutors are not holding back when it comes to holding corporate executives accountable.
 
Charlie Chi was sentenced for intentionally distributing a medical device used in knee replacement surgery despite the fact that the Food and Drug Administration had denied the company's application for marketing clearance. In December 2014, Chi admitted to distributing, with the intent to defraud and mislead, adulterated medical devices into interstate commerce in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
 
In addition to the 24-month prison sentence, Chi was ordered to serve one-year of supervised release and to pay a $75,000 fine. Prior to his own sentencing, OtisMed Corp., in September 2014, was hit with a criminal fine of $34.4 million and ordered to pay $5.16 million in criminal forfeiture.

Read More>>

Last Updated on Tuesday, 18 August 2015 11:22
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 9 of 42


Banner
Website design, development, and hosting provided by
Netphiles