|For daring to study a discredited therapy, this doctor earned scorn - and a $37 million grant|
|Written by Karen Weintraub | STAT|
|Tuesday, 03 January 2017 20:09|
MIAMI BEACH, FL - The new heart patient asked Dr. Gervasio Lamas if he thought chelation therapy was worth a try. "Of course not!" the cardiologist replied emphatically. His Harvard training had taught him that alternative therapies were a waste of time and money, and potentially risky to boot. "I told him it was quackery."
But Lamas went home that night unsure if he had given his patient the best medical advice. He looked up research on chelation therapy, which removes heavy metals from the body, and found very little data either supporting or contradicting the procedure.
Lamas was troubled by the idea that he had offered this man a medical opinion that wasn't supported by science. And he decided to conduct a study himself. He had no idea what he was getting into.
|Last Updated on Friday, 20 January 2017 18:39|
Website design, development, and hosting provided by